14 readers online now

99,284 comments by 26,351 readers

Go to Mobile Site

RESPONSE TO MR. PHIL GREEND ON SHARIA LAW
Reader comment on item: Islamic Law in the United States?
in response to reader comment: shari'a law at odds with humanity

Submitted by DANIEL REDMOND (United States), Oct 31, 2007 at 03:07

I am in agreement that the implementation of Islam's Sharia civil code into American society is unthinkable. It is an abomination that it exists anywhere in the world today. For the record, here are a few of the edicts placed by Sharia upon its subjugated masses:

Stoning to death as a form of capital punishment. It is estimated that approximately 7,000 women have been stoned to death in Iran since the Iranian revolution of 1979, mostly for the rather petty crime of prostitution. Adultery is another "crime" punishable by stoning. The Iranian theocracy is quite helpful in carrying out this punishment, by the way, and actually delivers truckloads of stones of the "correct" size to the site of the execution to be utilized by the howling crowd of Muslims for deliverance of the punishment. In a particularly cruel and sadistic twist to this practice, the children of stoning victims are forced to witness the execution as well.

Decapitation is also utilized as a means of execution. As recently as 1977 even a nineteen year old Saudi Royal princess was publicly decapitated by sword in a parking lot in Jeddah for the crime of adultery and that country employs executioners who travel the land with sword in hand for the express purpose of lopping off the heads of the condemned. A friend of mine reports that while on a business trip to Riyahd a few years ago 18 people were executed in the city by this method in a single week, most of them for the "crime" of being homosexuals.

Chopping off of hands. This public mutilation by sword is routinely performed in all Muslim countries, as dictated by Sharia, for the crime of theft.

Honor killings. These occur when a woman has "brought dishonor upon the family" as a result of having done something as innocuous as being seen kissing a boyfriend in public, or any other remotely sexual expression of public affection. Under Sharia the dishonor must be removed by male members of the family through the murder of the offending female, who is quite often a teenaged girl. This summary execution is also typically visited upon rape victims, for they too have managed---through their own victimization---to have brought dishonor upon their families. It is a very common practice.

Under Sharia a woman's word in a court of law is worth half that of a man's, a clear case of gender discrimination and inequality of the sexes. In cases of "he said / she said," as in rape cases with no witnesses, "he" always wins. This has extremely negative consequences for the rape victim, for now, having admitted to having had sex out of wedlock, she will be subject to death by stoning.

Within just the past few years a fire broke out in a girls' school in Saudi Arabia. As young girls in their early teens attempted to escape the burning building many of them were beaten back into the building with batons by the religious police---yes, they have police who strictly enforce Sharia---because they were not wearing their veils as required by Sharia. Twelve of the girls died in the flames.

Clearly Islam's concept of justice, as found under Sharia, is incompatible with our own Constitutional freedoms and cannot ever be accepted as a valid legal system by any truly civilized society.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (35) on this item

Title By Date
Iran, Relegion, free trade policies, all in a mess not econmics??? [349 words]Firozali A Mulla MBA PhDFeb 17, 2008 02:17
One Day freedom But it is a bliss YES SIR I need this type of news [114 words]Firozali A Mulla MBA PhDJan 25, 2008 12:21
Islam and selling to them the right way? [196 words]Firozali A Mulla MBA PhDJan 15, 2008 11:44
#811: Pipes on "Annapolis Blues" in the Jerusalem Post [95 words]Suren SukhtankarNov 2, 2007 10:44
DO WE HAVE A TRUE "DEMOCRACY" IN AMERICA? [749 words]DANIEL REDMONDNov 3, 2007 10:29
Is this democracy? [444 words]Firozali A Mulla MBA PhDJan 15, 2008 23:58
Firozali, do not complain [170 words]AngelMar 31, 2009 13:43
Legacy of monotheism [41 words]David W. LincolnOct 28, 2007 04:41
Muslim Heretics [1005 words]gary fouseOct 24, 2007 01:01
WE SHOULD ALL BE HERETICS [282 words]DANIEL REDMONDOct 25, 2007 22:25
Heretics [284 words]gary fouseOct 26, 2007 22:12
THE LUNACY OF RELIGION [293 words]DANIEL REDMONDOct 27, 2007 18:41
RESPONSE TO MR. FOUSE [459 words]DANIEL REDMONDOct 28, 2007 17:29
Heretics [130 words]gary fouseOct 28, 2007 20:45
DEAR MR. FOUSE [256 words]DANIEL REDMONDOct 30, 2007 00:39
Heretics [15 words]gary fouseOct 30, 2007 20:27
YES, MR. FOUSE, CHRISTIANS ARE "NOT INVOLVED" [152 words]DANIEL REDMONDNov 1, 2007 18:45
not really.... [290 words]donvanNov 2, 2007 17:01
heretics [111 words]gary fouseNov 2, 2007 21:18
FOLLOW-UP COMMENTS TO MR. FOUSE [203 words]DANIEL REDMONDNov 4, 2007 07:41
REPLY TO DONVAN RE: WE SHOULD ALL BE HERETICS [729 words]DANIEL REDMONDNov 4, 2007 08:39
Dismissive [197 words]donvanNov 5, 2007 09:41
The HOLY book of Islam is Quran, with Q hard in Queensland [106 words]Firozali A MullaJan 25, 2008 20:10
Islamic Law in the United States? [121 words]Firozali A.Mulla MBA PhDOct 23, 2007 05:20
Comment on Islamic Law in the United States? [159 words]Firozali A.MullaNov 1, 2007 05:37
committee hearings and demonstrations? [61 words]greykangarooOct 23, 2007 01:33
Squirm Factor [58 words]AthosOct 21, 2007 18:45
Laws of Personal Status
[w/response] [306 words]
Fred SchlomkaOct 21, 2007 09:58
don't forget eruvs [38 words]ira levineOct 21, 2007 17:19
RESPONSE TO IRA LEVINE [286 words]DANIEL REDMONDOct 29, 2007 20:23
shari'a law at odds with humanity [64 words]Phil GreendOct 20, 2007 10:34
and 2 women... [303 words]TajOct 28, 2007 03:49
⇒ RESPONSE TO MR. PHIL GREEND ON SHARIA LAW [555 words]DANIEL REDMONDOct 31, 2007 03:07
THE BROWNBACK / MUKASEY DIALOGUE [253 words]DANIEL REDMONDOct 20, 2007 01:18
He who holds the votes, makes the rules [64 words]jennifer solisOct 19, 2007 14:39

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

Premium Links by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: MeqMef@aol.com

You can help support Daniel Pipes' important work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.