To Jimmy, a different perspective. II

Submitted by Ynnatchkah (United States), Oct 20, 2007 at 22:30

Dear Sir Jimmy:

Let's suppose you totally disagree to my first message in regards to Almontasser, qualifying it as absurd or wrong, and let's suppose you are right (just to create an antithesis for the first hypothesis).

Almontasser with her attitude creates/ originates and perpetuates what I call, "slow motion Jihad". But Why?

Whenever there is a suicide bomber or a disgraced where a Muslim is a terrorist predator and criminal, always an ""almontasser" sample comes in defense of the Islamist kind by stating that she does not recognize those ones as Muslims and Arabs. It is a Motto.

Most recently it happened in Seattle, when an Islamic fascist terrorist and predators invaded the Jewish Family Center in Seattle. Immediately after, some Muslim said he does not represent Islam and some other said this Muslim is mentally disable. CAIR fakely condemned the terrorist attack. All Three kinds of Muslims struggle to dissociate their image from terrorist as a way to inferiorly lure us.

The above fact, plus the rate of their population, a positive rate of change resulting in an absurd increase of their kind, a rate higher for to say than rabbits under the influence of "V-agra", , is a way this kind found to also erase infidels and overlap the local population in each point of earth, replacing it my strictly Muslims. Again that's what I call SLOW and silent Jihad.

You have several types of Jihad: Indoctrination, economical control, blackmail oil Jihad, totalitaric Jihad in Islamic Lands, Lobbies in the white house, defending the bestialities of terrorist condoners such as the CAIR (Council of angry islamo fascist radicals- Council of "American" Islamic relations), Cyber Jihad and very slow Jihad, like the above one. The way this Islamic Fascist female played victim and advocated not recognizing them as Arab Muslims, is just a way of Jihad- Do you follow that?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".