Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Boundaries.
Reader comment on item: Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts Promote Radical Islam

Submitted by Monte Gardner (United States), Oct 12, 2007 at 22:22

I wonder if we aren't beeing a bit over-cautious here. I mean, come on, its the Girl Scouts for crying out loud. If having a celebration of traditional, and inoffensive Islamic cultural norms such as respect for the Koran and the wearing of the Hijab is to be seen as "Islamist" or threatening in some sense, then what avenue do moderate Muslims have to celebrate their culture.

You're connecting of the dots based on a terrorist having a business card of such and such that was chaired by thus and such and etc seems a little bit strained. At the end of the day, integration must go both ways. This means that at the same time we firmly demand that Islamic immigrants become Americans by accepting American political norms such as secularism and equality before the law, we must also allow for at least the possibility that the US is going to become just a little bit more Islamic.

(Calm down folks).

By that I mean the same thing as what one might mean by saying the US has become just a little bit more Mexican, or just a little bit more Irish, or a little bit more LDS (Also an unpopular immigrant group at one time). If we criticize every act of cultural self-expression as "Islamist", then this integration can never occur. If radical Islam is the problem and moderate Muslims are the solution, then we must allow those moderates atleast a little bit of wiggle room to express their culture, even when it is different from our own.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (12) on this item

Title By Date
BNP connection? [193 words]gd jamesJan 30, 2009 20:12
Non-denominational [59 words]KykywkaJan 25, 2009 09:48
more info [180 words]ravin blackJan 25, 2009 02:06
⇒ Boundaries. [260 words]Monte GardnerOct 12, 2007 22:22
Hmmm [10 words]WatchJan 23, 2009 22:13
Allow a little bit of wiggle room for the Muslims .....? [38 words]KristaJan 31, 2009 17:06
Let's see [13 words]Brit PatSep 5, 2007 14:55
muslim or not muslim [59 words]dallaskilgoreSep 3, 2007 21:38
Overgeneralizations [103 words]GeneralizationsOct 14, 2007 00:53
Generalisations [139 words]Adam the Scot.Jan 23, 2009 17:32
Promotion of False Religion in the Boy Scouts
[w/response] [112 words]
Leigh Ann CoudrietOct 11, 2006 11:19
Christian/Judeo? Are you kidding me? [223 words]Ignorance is BlissFeb 27, 2008 17:57

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page