Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Your Historical References are Great!
Reader comment on item: The Year the Arabs Discovered Palestine

Submitted by Saul Pfeffer (Canada), Jul 2, 2002 at 11:30

Keeping your historical perspective in mind, I think it is time for the official Israeli position to be restated. We should again and again in every medium possible state that a Arab Palestinian state already exists, that it comprises 90% of the former British mandate and that those who have a quarrel with that proposition address themselves to the King of Jordan who is now sitting on most of the Palestinian mandate formerly controlled by the British.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (8) on this item

Title By Date
Palestinian Nationalism [62 words]SarahFeb 25, 2009 02:04
Please Try To Use Your Mind [115 words]San ManDec 18, 2008 05:25
Mr. San Man, get an education and stop accepting what uneducated Mullahs invent.... [238 words]Truth in HistoryAug 18, 2009 14:12
all nationalism is superficial...even Israeli [121 words]russDec 6, 2008 08:26
Did Arabs really envision or strive for an "independent Palestinian state" before 1964?
[w/response] [59 words]
DrRJPJan 29, 2008 20:55
Attempts to Change History [187 words]L.Mar 25, 2005 12:55
Once more, your prediction comes true. [85 words]Rachel NeuwirthOct 19, 2002 10:58
⇒ Your Historical References are Great! [77 words]Saul PfefferJul 2, 2002 11:30

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page