| Daniel Pipes Mobile Edition Regular Site |
|
| Home | Articles | Blog | Reviews | Search | |
Submitted by Egil Ulateig (Norway), Aug 31, 2007 at 11:32
So, judges in Western European courts are to decide what in the Sharia is acceptable to the country`s own laws and the international law. I wonder how many strange judgements we are going to have in the future, based on this working principle. The Sharia is absolutely incongruent with modern, civilized law, and should be banned. This is also the attitude of a number of dissidents in Muslim countries.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
| Title | By | Date |
| Non-Muslims use Shar'i courts (let this not fool anyone) [173 words] | P C Mani | Sep 13, 2009 00:19 |
| London flashpoint [240 words] | Andrew Kyle | Aug 1, 2009 07:41 |
| Superstition based policing? [32 words] | EdS | Jul 26, 2009 18:32 |
| United Nations attempting to silence all speech against Islam [502 words] | diane | Dec 2, 2008 00:22 |
| ⇒ Sharia Law [69 words] | Egil Ulateig | Aug 31, 2007 11:32 |
| Australian PM John Howard gave the right response re.imposing sharia. [48 words] | M.D'Souza | May 29, 2007 20:50 |
| ↔ Your sentiment is right but the danger is deeper [79 words] | George P | Aug 12, 2009 22:41 |
| Forget it [59 words] | David W. Lincoln | May 28, 2007 16:20 |
| Necessary precautions [42 words] | DAVID R. GROESBECK | May 28, 2007 07:48 |