| Daniel Pipes Mobile Edition Regular Site |
|
| Home | Articles | Blog | Reviews | Search | |
Submitted by Pat (United States), Jul 21, 2007 at 13:55
Point taken. A rivalry developed. By the time the Russian Revolution occurred, Americans were already turning against Wilsonian policies. You cannot call the fear of communism in the US neurotic unless you think there was no danger posed. Western Europe had been gravely weakened by the first world war and the Soviets had very real aspirations toward global dominance at a time when America was very much isolationist, for which America was roundly criticized by Europeans who themselves wouldn't deal with the dictators on their own doorstep. The pogroms in Russia and the nationalization of industries cannot be overlooked or brushed off. Hitler and Stalin had a non-aggression pact and Stalin stood by as Hitler overran the rest of Europe. America didn't cause any of this.
The Russians' primary rival was Britain. FDR saw himself as the friendly mediator and was more trusting of Stalin than was Winston Churchill. The commander of the allied forces, General Eisenhower, believed there was a "special bond" between the US and the Soviet Union and that "there was no cause to regard the future with pessimism".
There may have been a fear of Communism in the US but it didn't affect FDR in the slightest. He brushed off those who came to him with proof of Soviet treachery. He disregarded those who came to him with what they considered to be evidence that the Soviets had massacred 15,000 Polish officers in the Katyn Forest. Just two weeks before he died, FDR suppressed the publication by a naval officer of an article suggesting that Russia might turn out to be a greater menace than Nazi Germany. The admiral who wrote the article was shipped off to Samoa. At Yalta, FDR allowed Stalin to make agreements he had no intention of keeping, such as "free and unfettered elections" in the eastern countries (when such elections had never even been held in Russia) and made it known to Stalin that he was "determined that there shall be no breach between ourselves and the Soviet Union". FDR told Stalin that the US most likely would withdraw its troops within two years of the end of the war. He felt Americans would not sanction their extended presence in Europe and he was unwilling to repeat Wilson's experience.
That's a heck of a way for the US to start a cold war.
There are always a few military commanders who want to keep a war going. Some Americans wanted to go into Iraq after routing the Iraqis from Kuwait. They were held back by their own generals and by civilian commanders. MacArthur wanted to go into China. Harry Truman pulled him back. To blame America for the Cold War is silly. Soviet diplomacy is a direct descendant of Bolshevik diplomacy and both had one overriding principle: hostility toward the West.
Stalin was threatened by capitalism itself. He needed "friendly governments" as a buffer between Russia and Germany. FDR and Churchill wanted free countries. The resulting conflict was inevitable. It became a cold war for one reason: nuclear weapons made WWIII inconceivable.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
| Title | By | Date |
| unleash the mek [w/response] [74 words] | behrooz | Jun 9, 2008 20:28 |
| MEK has AMERICAN blood on it's hands, CIVILIAN AMERICANS [38 words] | Jesabel Allende | Oct 25, 2007 03:40 |
| Use the MEK if possible, but don't support them [141 words] | Charles Martel | Aug 29, 2007 14:53 |
| Mr. Alberts comments [71 words] | ali | Aug 12, 2007 10:01 |
| Unleash the Iranian Opposition, the Mujahedeen-e Khalq [w/response] [333 words] | Jahanshah Rashidian | Jul 28, 2007 08:39 |
| Comment on MEK [310 words] | Jahanshah Rashidian | Jul 25, 2007 05:43 |
| Article about iranian opposition(MEK) [113 words] | Azam Shahriary | Jul 19, 2007 23:04 |
| Sorry, Dr. Pipes. I'm still a sceptic [193 words] | Peter Herz | Jul 18, 2007 18:36 |
| Why not unleash Al Qaida too ? [44 words] | James Fischer | Jul 16, 2007 20:42 |
| misplaced concerns [1112 words] | Albert Davidson | Jul 16, 2007 14:46 |
| Solution for Iranian & American [51 words] | Mohamad | Jul 16, 2007 14:11 |
| Um... isn't MEK made up mostly of ethnic Arabs??? [241 words] | Chris G. | Jul 16, 2007 10:13 |
| linkage [44 words] | Consul-At-Arms | Jul 15, 2007 03:06 |
| Proudly Canadian, trusting my elected officials and disagreeing with Dr Pipes [197 words] | Harrak | Jul 14, 2007 18:59 |
| Unleash the Iranian Opposition[, the Mujahedeen-e Khalq] [1426 words] | Ed Melik, Esq. | Jul 13, 2007 22:22 |
| Questions regarding Mujahedeen-e Khalq [67 words] | Stuart Fagin | Jul 13, 2007 00:10 |
| Needed: Better Antidote to Political Infections [423 words] | M. Tovey | Jul 12, 2007 19:02 |
| Im surprised America finances them and arms them [30 words] | Leyla | Jul 12, 2007 15:43 |
| SUPPORTING TERORISM IS NOT A SOLUTION [31 words] | MAMAMIA TONTERIA | Jul 12, 2007 13:03 |
| MEK [34 words] | Monte Gardner | Jul 12, 2007 11:42 |
| Beware of arming strangers! [244 words] | Daniel Hershtal | Jul 12, 2007 05:05 |
| Devil and the Deep blue sea [42 words] | Sankar MANICKA | Jul 12, 2007 04:38 |
| MeK [47 words] | DAVID R. GROESBECK | Jul 12, 2007 04:06 |
| Using MEK is a Lose-Lose Proposition [267 words] | Azadi Iran | Jul 11, 2007 21:44 |
| ↔ Pro-American? To what degree? [151 words] | Pat | Jul 15, 2007 18:53 |
| Now We're Talking [294 words] | Blackspeare | Jul 11, 2007 14:57 |
| No need to arm the MEK [391 words] | Alex George | Jul 11, 2007 13:51 |
| Can We Be Sure the Iranian People Differ Fundamentally from Their Rulers? [190 words] | Gary | Jul 11, 2007 13:39 |
| ↔ Yes Gary - Iranian people do not differ even an iota from their leaders!!1 [239 words] | Jaladhi | Jul 16, 2007 15:30 |
| ↔ Agreed! The Whole Region is United Against Us [143 words] | Gary | Jul 21, 2007 15:11 |
| Can we trust MEK later - after the Iranian regime is toppled??? [85 words] | Jaladhi | Jul 11, 2007 11:29 |
| You Gotta Be Kidding Me! [90 words] | Caesar Warrington | Jul 11, 2007 10:11 |
| "putting it officially on a par with the likes of Al-Qaeda, Hamas, and Hizbullah" [48 words] | Pez Dispenser | Jul 11, 2007 04:25 |
| Nefarious policies of MEK [377 words] | gama | Jul 11, 2007 03:33 |
| FYI [13 words] | Rich | Jul 11, 2007 00:14 |
| You Say What Should Be Done, But Not What We Can Help To Do [w/response] [54 words] | Lou Stouch | Jul 10, 2007 21:17 |
| MEK PATHETIC PARADOX [340 words] | Darius KADIVAR | Jul 10, 2007 18:04 |
| The MEK and the Mullahs [54 words] | Harvey Logan | Jul 10, 2007 16:24 |
| ↔ Easy [91 words] | Blackspeare | Jul 11, 2007 20:18 |
| Very interesting [68 words] | David W. Lincoln | Jul 10, 2007 15:48 |
| MEK [167 words] | Donald W. Bales | Jul 10, 2007 14:43 |
| Support the MEK, but Recognize that it is Still an Opportunistic Cult [157 words] | Alex | Jul 10, 2007 14:18 |
| Not Likely [197 words] | LDC | Jul 10, 2007 13:54 |
| Iran 2.0: Now We're Talking [74 words] | Joe | Jul 10, 2007 12:37 |
| How Do We Trick Foggy Bottom Into Helping Them? [242 words] | orange yonason | Jul 10, 2007 11:35 |
| Time For The People Of Iran To Take Back Their Country [64 words] | AnneM | Jul 10, 2007 11:08 |
| The enemy of my enemy? [464 words] | Pat | Jul 10, 2007 10:09 |
| ↔ Fact or Fiction [82 words] | Blackspeare | Jul 13, 2007 16:46 |
| ↔ ⇒ More to the story [511 words] | Pat | Jul 21, 2007 13:55 |
| Afghanistan's Mujahedeen [52 words] | Edward Halper | Jul 10, 2007 09:18 |