Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Back to Tony: Aye, well said Sir...
Reader comment on item: Palestinian Anarchy Continues under Hamas
in response to reader comment: No problem but Its not common for things to be that simple

Submitted by Seamus MacNemi (United States), Jul 12, 2007 at 18:42

I wholeheartedly agree with you on all of your points made. Matters are not as simplistic as they are often made out to be either in Ireland or in Palestine.

One could hardly be Irish without seeing the suffering of his own folk in the suffering of others and the black cloud of history hanging over all of our heads thanks be to the British for that. But we all are capable of making our own decisions as to what we want and will do under any circumstance and the Palestinian Arabs seem unwilling to take the open option that peace with Israel might bring.

Arabs living under Israeli control are loathe to be transferred to the Palestinian side for one reason and that is that their lives are far and away much better under the Israelis than they would be under the control of the likes of Hamas or that pirate regime of Arafats hand. Having seen that with my own eyes I can safely say that peace with Israel would bring the Palestinians all of what they might wish for as a people and yet they continnually refuse to accept the hand of friendship that is offered.

I have worked with Israeli Arabs and to a man their attitude is as I have described. They all prefer to be under Isralei control even if they sometimes feel the sting of ignorant prejudice directed against them. They are not alone in their feelings of rejection. They share a common bond in their suffering with the Sephardic community in Israel who are often treated as second class citizens by the Ashkenazi Northern Europeans who hold most of the wealth and political power in Israel.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (18) on this item

Title By Date
the fatah 's milice [21 words]samyJun 18, 2007 10:35
response to the fatah's milice, you are corrrect, but...... [215 words]Joe KaffirJun 18, 2007 19:45
Samy, you're right, but it doesnt mean anything you think it means [478 words]BosJun 19, 2007 06:38
Hamas and Reflection [98 words]Yuri GuriSep 1, 2006 20:05
Ghazi Hamad [34 words]Steven LSep 1, 2006 01:09
PA (Hammas) Spokesman [130 words]Bill ChicagoAug 31, 2006 12:46
think some more. [765 words]TonyJun 18, 2007 11:46
Thank you Tony. You saved me a real fume [110 words]Seamus MacNemiJul 3, 2007 22:08
No problem but Its not common for things to be that simple [643 words]TonyJul 9, 2007 08:47
⇒ Back to Tony: Aye, well said Sir... [284 words]Seamus MacNemiJul 12, 2007 18:42
Comparison IRA and "Palestinian Terrorist" [266 words]Penny McBrideAug 29, 2007 15:11
dear Penny, it was the welsh actually [1031 words]TonyFeb 3, 2008 11:16
How Sweetly Ironic [41 words]orange yonasonAug 30, 2006 20:21
Fair Weather Ahead, Or More Of The Same Mayhem? [415 words]orange yonasonAug 30, 2006 19:54
Reply to Orange Yonason [27 words]Seamus MacNemiJul 3, 2007 22:15
Islam a religion of peace [40 words]InfidelAug 27, 2006 16:27
Islam is NOT a religion of peace [90 words]Dr RJPAug 29, 2006 00:16
The idiocy of religious conversion [177 words]Seamus MacNemiJul 12, 2007 19:43

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page