| Daniel Pipes Mobile Edition Regular Site |
|
| Home | Articles | Blog | Reviews | Search | |
Submitted by Daniel Hershtal (Israel), Jul 12, 2007 at 05:05
The idea of regime change in Iran has been a tempting solution to the problems Iran is causing. However, one must think at least twice of the consequences of unleashing the beast of revolution.
America armed the Islamists in Afghanistan in the 1980s with the theory that they would be better than the communists. The KLA in Serbia has turned out to be just as bloodthirsty as the Serbian regime it was helped to defeat. Do we really know enough about these "Mujahadeen" - a scary name for members, even if they do let women wear t-shirts - to give them arms and an international forum from which to operate? Even if they promise to back away from Nuclear technology, can we trust they won't build up the program again quickly from this regime's hidden reserves?
Even if we do think that MEK are angels-among-men, can we guarantee that once they topple the current regime that they will come out on top? Iraq and Afghanistan both seem to show that peace-loving democrats don't fair so well in a battle-ridden environment. As is often the case, a revolution begins with Rousseaus and Voltaires and ends with Robespierres and Napoleans. Pacifists generally don't fair well in international politics, especially in the Middle East.
I urge the US to take decisive action against Iran, but supporting and arming lesser-known opposition groups may cause worse problems for the Persian people, and the world, in the very near future.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
| Title | By | Date |
| unleash the mek [w/response] [74 words] | behrooz | Jun 9, 2008 20:28 |
| MEK has AMERICAN blood on it's hands, CIVILIAN AMERICANS [38 words] | Jesabel Allende | Oct 25, 2007 03:40 |
| Use the MEK if possible, but don't support them [141 words] | Charles Martel | Aug 29, 2007 14:53 |
| Mr. Alberts comments [71 words] | ali | Aug 12, 2007 10:01 |
| Unleash the Iranian Opposition, the Mujahedeen-e Khalq [w/response] [333 words] | Jahanshah Rashidian | Jul 28, 2007 08:39 |
| Comment on MEK [310 words] | Jahanshah Rashidian | Jul 25, 2007 05:43 |
| Article about iranian opposition(MEK) [113 words] | Azam Shahriary | Jul 19, 2007 23:04 |
| Sorry, Dr. Pipes. I'm still a sceptic [193 words] | Peter Herz | Jul 18, 2007 18:36 |
| Why not unleash Al Qaida too ? [44 words] | James Fischer | Jul 16, 2007 20:42 |
| misplaced concerns [1112 words] | Albert Davidson | Jul 16, 2007 14:46 |
| Solution for Iranian & American [51 words] | Mohamad | Jul 16, 2007 14:11 |
| Um... isn't MEK made up mostly of ethnic Arabs??? [241 words] | Chris G. | Jul 16, 2007 10:13 |
| linkage [44 words] | Consul-At-Arms | Jul 15, 2007 03:06 |
| Proudly Canadian, trusting my elected officials and disagreeing with Dr Pipes [197 words] | Harrak | Jul 14, 2007 18:59 |
| Unleash the Iranian Opposition[, the Mujahedeen-e Khalq] [1426 words] | Ed Melik, Esq. | Jul 13, 2007 22:22 |
| Questions regarding Mujahedeen-e Khalq [67 words] | Stuart Fagin | Jul 13, 2007 00:10 |
| Needed: Better Antidote to Political Infections [423 words] | M. Tovey | Jul 12, 2007 19:02 |
| Im surprised America finances them and arms them [30 words] | Leyla | Jul 12, 2007 15:43 |
| SUPPORTING TERORISM IS NOT A SOLUTION [31 words] | MAMAMIA TONTERIA | Jul 12, 2007 13:03 |
| MEK [34 words] | Monte Gardner | Jul 12, 2007 11:42 |
| ⇒ Beware of arming strangers! [244 words] | Daniel Hershtal | Jul 12, 2007 05:05 |
| Devil and the Deep blue sea [42 words] | Sankar MANICKA | Jul 12, 2007 04:38 |
| MeK [47 words] | DAVID R. GROESBECK | Jul 12, 2007 04:06 |
| Using MEK is a Lose-Lose Proposition [267 words] | Azadi Iran | Jul 11, 2007 21:44 |
| ↔ Pro-American? To what degree? [151 words] | Pat | Jul 15, 2007 18:53 |
| Now We're Talking [294 words] | Blackspeare | Jul 11, 2007 14:57 |
| No need to arm the MEK [391 words] | Alex George | Jul 11, 2007 13:51 |
| Can We Be Sure the Iranian People Differ Fundamentally from Their Rulers? [190 words] | Gary | Jul 11, 2007 13:39 |
| ↔ Yes Gary - Iranian people do not differ even an iota from their leaders!!1 [239 words] | Jaladhi | Jul 16, 2007 15:30 |
| ↔ Agreed! The Whole Region is United Against Us [143 words] | Gary | Jul 21, 2007 15:11 |
| Can we trust MEK later - after the Iranian regime is toppled??? [85 words] | Jaladhi | Jul 11, 2007 11:29 |
| You Gotta Be Kidding Me! [90 words] | Caesar Warrington | Jul 11, 2007 10:11 |
| "putting it officially on a par with the likes of Al-Qaeda, Hamas, and Hizbullah" [48 words] | Pez Dispenser | Jul 11, 2007 04:25 |
| Nefarious policies of MEK [377 words] | gama | Jul 11, 2007 03:33 |
| FYI [13 words] | Rich | Jul 11, 2007 00:14 |
| You Say What Should Be Done, But Not What We Can Help To Do [w/response] [54 words] | Lou Stouch | Jul 10, 2007 21:17 |
| MEK PATHETIC PARADOX [340 words] | Darius KADIVAR | Jul 10, 2007 18:04 |
| The MEK and the Mullahs [54 words] | Harvey Logan | Jul 10, 2007 16:24 |
| ↔ Easy [91 words] | Blackspeare | Jul 11, 2007 20:18 |
| Very interesting [68 words] | David W. Lincoln | Jul 10, 2007 15:48 |
| MEK [167 words] | Donald W. Bales | Jul 10, 2007 14:43 |
| Support the MEK, but Recognize that it is Still an Opportunistic Cult [157 words] | Alex | Jul 10, 2007 14:18 |
| Not Likely [197 words] | LDC | Jul 10, 2007 13:54 |
| Iran 2.0: Now We're Talking [74 words] | Joe | Jul 10, 2007 12:37 |
| How Do We Trick Foggy Bottom Into Helping Them? [242 words] | orange yonason | Jul 10, 2007 11:35 |
| Time For The People Of Iran To Take Back Their Country [64 words] | AnneM | Jul 10, 2007 11:08 |
| The enemy of my enemy? [464 words] | Pat | Jul 10, 2007 10:09 |
| ↔ Fact or Fiction [82 words] | Blackspeare | Jul 13, 2007 16:46 |
| ↔ More to the story [511 words] | Pat | Jul 21, 2007 13:55 |
| Afghanistan's Mujahedeen [52 words] | Edward Halper | Jul 10, 2007 09:18 |