| Daniel Pipes Mobile Edition Regular Site |
|
| Home | Articles | Blog | Reviews | Search | |
Submitted by Pat (United States), Jul 10, 2007 at 10:09
This proposal seems daring and also foolhardy. It sounds like what we did after the mullahs took over Iran. We supported Saddam Hussein (albeit briefly) in his war against Iran to prevent an Iranian victory. What good did it do? Maybe the two of them fought each other for eight years but at the end of that time we had created a second monster and were soon at war with him in Kuwait. We helped the people of Afghanistan. Once they drove the Soviets out they began fighting amongst themselves and the group that came out on top, the Taliban, turned on us.
The name of the group, People's Mujahedeen of Iran, should give no American confidence in their good intentions. Aren't Mujahedeen Islamic holy warriors? Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah, Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood and many more consider themselves mujahedeen. That this group calls itself the people's mujahedeen proves nothing. Its very name makes it suspect. It doesn't preclude a desire for Islamic domination over the West.
That they oppose the mullahs doesn't mean they will be friendly toward us. The Soviets allied with the West to defeat Hitler. After the war we became their target. The Saudis aligned with us against the Soviet Union during the Cold War. Once the Soviet threat dissipated, their campaign of jihad began in earnest. Why should we trust any group from Iran until they prove themselves? Fancy productions such as the one described are also aimed at the West and they can paint a false picture, making the Iranian resistance seem much larger than it really is. I would compare it to the Cuban community in Miami. Vocal and well-to-do, but without much influence in their native country.
Islam teaches that war is taqiyya. Muslims are allowed to lie in order to protect themselves. Are we to believe that MEK wants friendly relations with the US? The absence of America and Israel from their statements proves nothing. Once the mullahs are out of the way why shouldn't both countries expect to move up on their target list? If they really want to be allies of the US why not say so? Let the people of Iran know where they stand. A lie of omission is still a lie. How many times must we build up people whose ultimate aim is to destroy us?
The people of Iran don't live in a vacuum. They already know that there is an alternative to theocracy. If they want it, then they are going to have to risk "their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor" to get it. Do they want it that badly? Is freedom worth such a high price? Only the Iranian people can answer that.
What valid reason is there to trust any "opposition" groups from Iran? Remember Iran-Contra?
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
| Title | By | Date |
| unleash the mek [w/response] [74 words] | behrooz | Jun 9, 2008 20:28 |
| MEK has AMERICAN blood on it's hands, CIVILIAN AMERICANS [38 words] | Jesabel Allende | Oct 25, 2007 03:40 |
| Use the MEK if possible, but don't support them [141 words] | Charles Martel | Aug 29, 2007 14:53 |
| Mr. Alberts comments [71 words] | ali | Aug 12, 2007 10:01 |
| Unleash the Iranian Opposition, the Mujahedeen-e Khalq [w/response] [333 words] | Jahanshah Rashidian | Jul 28, 2007 08:39 |
| Comment on MEK [310 words] | Jahanshah Rashidian | Jul 25, 2007 05:43 |
| Article about iranian opposition(MEK) [113 words] | Azam Shahriary | Jul 19, 2007 23:04 |
| Sorry, Dr. Pipes. I'm still a sceptic [193 words] | Peter Herz | Jul 18, 2007 18:36 |
| Why not unleash Al Qaida too ? [44 words] | James Fischer | Jul 16, 2007 20:42 |
| misplaced concerns [1112 words] | Albert Davidson | Jul 16, 2007 14:46 |
| Solution for Iranian & American [51 words] | Mohamad | Jul 16, 2007 14:11 |
| Um... isn't MEK made up mostly of ethnic Arabs??? [241 words] | Chris G. | Jul 16, 2007 10:13 |
| linkage [44 words] | Consul-At-Arms | Jul 15, 2007 03:06 |
| Proudly Canadian, trusting my elected officials and disagreeing with Dr Pipes [197 words] | Harrak | Jul 14, 2007 18:59 |
| Unleash the Iranian Opposition[, the Mujahedeen-e Khalq] [1426 words] | Ed Melik, Esq. | Jul 13, 2007 22:22 |
| Questions regarding Mujahedeen-e Khalq [67 words] | Stuart Fagin | Jul 13, 2007 00:10 |
| Needed: Better Antidote to Political Infections [423 words] | M. Tovey | Jul 12, 2007 19:02 |
| Im surprised America finances them and arms them [30 words] | Leyla | Jul 12, 2007 15:43 |
| SUPPORTING TERORISM IS NOT A SOLUTION [31 words] | MAMAMIA TONTERIA | Jul 12, 2007 13:03 |
| MEK [34 words] | Monte Gardner | Jul 12, 2007 11:42 |
| Beware of arming strangers! [244 words] | Daniel Hershtal | Jul 12, 2007 05:05 |
| Devil and the Deep blue sea [42 words] | Sankar MANICKA | Jul 12, 2007 04:38 |
| MeK [47 words] | DAVID R. GROESBECK | Jul 12, 2007 04:06 |
| Using MEK is a Lose-Lose Proposition [267 words] | Azadi Iran | Jul 11, 2007 21:44 |
| ↔ Pro-American? To what degree? [151 words] | Pat | Jul 15, 2007 18:53 |
| Now We're Talking [294 words] | Blackspeare | Jul 11, 2007 14:57 |
| No need to arm the MEK [391 words] | Alex George | Jul 11, 2007 13:51 |
| Can We Be Sure the Iranian People Differ Fundamentally from Their Rulers? [190 words] | Gary | Jul 11, 2007 13:39 |
| ↔ Yes Gary - Iranian people do not differ even an iota from their leaders!!1 [239 words] | Jaladhi | Jul 16, 2007 15:30 |
| ↔ Agreed! The Whole Region is United Against Us [143 words] | Gary | Jul 21, 2007 15:11 |
| Can we trust MEK later - after the Iranian regime is toppled??? [85 words] | Jaladhi | Jul 11, 2007 11:29 |
| You Gotta Be Kidding Me! [90 words] | Caesar Warrington | Jul 11, 2007 10:11 |
| "putting it officially on a par with the likes of Al-Qaeda, Hamas, and Hizbullah" [48 words] | Pez Dispenser | Jul 11, 2007 04:25 |
| Nefarious policies of MEK [377 words] | gama | Jul 11, 2007 03:33 |
| FYI [13 words] | Rich | Jul 11, 2007 00:14 |
| You Say What Should Be Done, But Not What We Can Help To Do [w/response] [54 words] | Lou Stouch | Jul 10, 2007 21:17 |
| MEK PATHETIC PARADOX [340 words] | Darius KADIVAR | Jul 10, 2007 18:04 |
| The MEK and the Mullahs [54 words] | Harvey Logan | Jul 10, 2007 16:24 |
| ↔ Easy [91 words] | Blackspeare | Jul 11, 2007 20:18 |
| Very interesting [68 words] | David W. Lincoln | Jul 10, 2007 15:48 |
| MEK [167 words] | Donald W. Bales | Jul 10, 2007 14:43 |
| Support the MEK, but Recognize that it is Still an Opportunistic Cult [157 words] | Alex | Jul 10, 2007 14:18 |
| Not Likely [197 words] | LDC | Jul 10, 2007 13:54 |
| Iran 2.0: Now We're Talking [74 words] | Joe | Jul 10, 2007 12:37 |
| How Do We Trick Foggy Bottom Into Helping Them? [242 words] | orange yonason | Jul 10, 2007 11:35 |
| Time For The People Of Iran To Take Back Their Country [64 words] | AnneM | Jul 10, 2007 11:08 |
| ⇒ The enemy of my enemy? [464 words] | Pat | Jul 10, 2007 10:09 |
| ↔ Fact or Fiction [82 words] | Blackspeare | Jul 13, 2007 16:46 |
| ↔ More to the story [511 words] | Pat | Jul 21, 2007 13:55 |
| Afghanistan's Mujahedeen [52 words] | Edward Halper | Jul 10, 2007 09:18 |