Poor in Mexico.
Reader comment on item: Arab Immigrants in Latin American Politics

Submitted by Ynnatchkah (United States), Jul 5, 2007 at 19:50

When reading about the provided link above, a poster posted the following:

"...The fact that one man controls 98% of the telephone wires and 80% of the wireless market, and then retail business, massive tracts of land is a symptom of this problem. The US immigration problem won't resolve itself until Mexico reforms this problem"...

Bush is really Shoeless in all aspects. It looks like he does everything on the opposite side.

Instead of puts in strong dynamics the Legal Immigration, he stops hundreds of thousands of brains from immigrating to the US, the vast majority with ethics and morality far above any Muslim would ever dream to reach, in terms of human values and integrity, and instead Bush focuses on the "poor" 12 million lawbreakers, that has not spend thousands and thousands of dollars and stress and exams and money trips, in order to stay perfectly Kosher in the US.

Yet, Mexico has this magnate that is clearly a criminal in my opinion, for not returning most pf his wealth to the poor...Criminal b/c obviously gambling and the control of stocks and puts and calls in Wall Street are not dead issues in his agenda. His financial power smashes millions, to later on proudly announce exuberant profits, giving to his CEOs and CFOs Christmas gifts that most of us will not see in 10 lives we come to earth.

Where is the American expertise and intelligence in all of these?

And he is Arab....How long it will take for him to start cooperating with Islamic Arabs...In fact; he already does that...When helping illegal immigration to the US due to "poverty". He helps Islamic terrorists to illegally immigrate to the US.

I'm so angry….

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.