Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Violent Jihadis v. Lawful Jihadis

by Daniel Pipes
December 24, 2008

updated Dec 28, 2008

Send RSS

The Middle East Media and Research Institute has published an interesting theological attack by a violent Islamist on a lawful Islamist. Titled "Syrian Jihadist Scholar Abu Basir Al-Tartusi: Sheikh Yousef Al-Qaradhawi is an Apostate," it sums up the argument of ‘Abd Al-Mun'im Mustafa Halima, known as Abu Basir Al-Tartusi, declaring Yousef Al-Qaradhawi an apostate.

Qaradhawi happens to be about the most prominent Sunni religious thinker alive today, someone who writes important books, heads influential organizations, and enjoys a high-profile media presence. Tartusi, however, presents several arguments to establish that Qaradhawi is no longer a Muslim. MEMRI's subheads provide the gist of his case, as Tartusi made it on his website on November 1, 2008:

Al-Tartusi concludes:

Because of all of the above, and in order to discharge my duty, and in order to advise the Islamic nation, I ruled – and I still hold to this ruling – that Yousef Al-Qaradhawi is an infidel, an apostate, and a heretic. All of the laws applying to infidels, apostates, and heretics apply to him, until he repents of the aforementioned beliefs.

Comment: This intramural hostility typifies the difference in outlook between Al-Qaeda-style Islamists and the Muslim Brethren, with the one hot-headed and the other patient, the former geared to violence, the latter working within the system. As I have often observed, the Muslim Brethren types have greater appeal and lasting power. (December 24, 2008)

receive the latest by email: subscribe to daniel pipes' free mailing list This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL.

Back to top of page