57 readers online now

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

Will Palestinian Prosperity End the Arab-Israeli Conflict?

by Daniel Pipes
Wed, 28 Dec 2005

updated Sat, 19 Apr 2008

Print Send Comment RSS Share:    

There's a persistent Western hope that if only Palestinians possessed nice apartments and late-model cars, they would accept the status quo and call off their war against Israel. It's a projection of Western priorities (economics trumps politics) that willfully ignores the Palestinians' clear record of just the reverse (politics trumping economics). It also defies the general historical record (enriching a party in the middle of war historically prompts it to make war more energetically).

I have been critiquing this idea for years. For example, I wrote in a 1997 discussion of Arab rejection of Israel's existence:

Caio Koch-Weser, a vice president of the World Bank with responsibility for the Middle East, explained in 1994 that for the peace process to succeed, "the Palestinians need to see improvements in their living conditions very quickly." But were Palestinians interested in the good life alone, they would long ago have settled into a comfortable synergy with Israel's dynamic economy. Instead, they have repeatedly shown that they are quite prepared to sacrifice the prospect of better living conditions if doing so will further the cause of obliterating Israel.

In a 2001 critique of Thomas Friedman:

"Underneath the old, encrusted olive-tree politics of this region," he writes, "is another politics bursting to get out, to get connected and to tie into the world of opportunities." Friedman's favoring of policies that disentangle Arabs from Israelis cause him to lavish praise on former president Bill Clinton for doing "the Lord's work" by pushing the parties so hard to reach an agreement. Unfortunately for Friedman's thesis (and Clinton's Nobel Prize aspirations), many Middle Easterners are still preoccupied by those "encrusted olive-tree politics" he has relegated to the dustbin of history

In an analysis of economics and warfare, again in 2001:

What Israel is doing - withholding tax money, denying entry to laborers, and restricting movement - fits into an ancient, sensible, and somewhat effective method of warfare. Why, then, is it expected to do otherwise? The reason, ironically, has little to do with the UN or US and much to do with Israelis themselves. They developed the "new Middle East" notion (which others now echo) that Israel's long-term welfare and security lies, not in depriving its enemies of resources, but in helping them develop their economies.

Years later, the notion of economically growing the Palestinians out of their determination to destroy the Jewish state has new life. Indeed, according to a headline in today's Wall Street Journal, it's a brand-new and sparklingly original idea: "Latest Answer To Mideast Crisis: Fix the Economy." In a worshipful account of James Wolfensohn, the former head of the World Bank "who is now a top diplomat in the region charged with fixing the beleaguered Palestinian economy," Karby Leggett informs us that

Wolfensohn is betting that the Middle East conflict needs not only a political settlement but also an economic one. Prosperity, he believes, will blunt the appeal of extremism and give Palestinians a stake in building a new state after years of nearly continuous violence.

Comment: It is mildly amazing how a failed idea like this one, that Palestinian Prosperity will resolve the Arab-Israeli conflict, does not die but keeps being rediscovered. (December 28, 2005)

Apr. 15, 2008 update: There are too many examples of this mentality for me to cover, but here is one that caught my attention: "New Home-Buying Plan May Bolster Abbas" reads the New York Times headline. The Bush administration has announced a new plan to devote US$500 million for a mortgage company, the Affordable Mortgage and Loan Company (AMAL), with the goal of building ten new neighborhoods over five years to bolster Mahmoud Abbas and his Fatah organization. Half the money will come from U.S. taxpayers via the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, half from a combination of the Palestine Investment Fund, the World Bank's International Finance Corporation, the Bank of Palestine, and the British government. Tony Blair calls the plan "a major step forward for ordinary Palestinians."

TrackBack URL for this post: http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/trackback.php/566/44d52/733

Reader comments on this weblog entry

Title By Date
Keep them on gruel [115 words]jennifer solisApr 22, 2008 01:16
Gruel is too good for them. [162 words]Joe KaffirApr 23, 2008 21:28
Either ways making the west submit to Islam. [319 words]YnnatchkahApr 20, 2008 21:44
New Home-Buying Plan ? [148 words]YnnatchkahApr 20, 2008 16:20
"palestinians" are not a nation, therefore... [169 words]koah1Mar 3, 2006 16:10
there is an answer [161 words]patemFeb 19, 2006 14:50
Hamas is that Jihadi in the window? World Bank = walking bombs [106 words]Ben van de PolderJan 17, 2006 21:10
Answer to title of article: NO [176 words]PDMJan 16, 2006 20:36
bad behavior [49 words]AdamJan 2, 2006 00:02
FOLLOW THE MONEY TRAIL [135 words]joncohenJan 1, 2006 12:49
Have food sent in! [73 words]PigfootJan 6, 2006 12:29
Prosperity and Democracy. [320 words]Robert LynnDec 31, 2005 21:06
NEVER [22 words]rachel ettelmanDec 31, 2005 11:53
Will Palestinian Prosperity End the Arab-Israeli Conflict? [77 words]JeffDec 30, 2005 14:39
all of the land was barren [89 words]yuval brandstetterDec 30, 2005 16:08
The business of corruption and terrorism [143 words]PigfootJan 5, 2006 17:13
PALESTINIAN DEVELOPMENT? [281 words]Fred KDec 30, 2005 13:11
Freedom and Gold [150 words]Mourad AntoineDec 31, 2005 17:35
Mindset Trumps Economics [331 words]ddsDec 30, 2005 12:37
And we know [15 words]R.MitelmanDec 28, 2005 14:51
Further to R.Mitelman [29 words]ddsDec 30, 2005 12:39

Comment on this weblog entry

Name
Email Address (optional)

Email me if someone replies to my comment
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments.

Top 25 recent comments
Daniel Pipes Blog Homepage

Daniel Pipes Blog Homepage

ADVERTISEMENTS

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site ©1979-2008 Daniel Pipes. Email: meqmef@aol.com