Will the Gaza Precedent Haunt Israel?

by Daniel Pipes
Thu, 18 Aug 2005
updated Mon, 29 Aug 2005

Send

Comment

RSS

"Everyone empathizes with what the Israelis are facing, [But] it cannot be Gaza only." So spoke Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, presumably articulating Bush administration policy. She does not, in this interview with the New York Times, further explain her meaning, but one can readily guess that she wishes the Israeli government to withdraw its civilians and soldiers first from the West Bank and – who knows? – some day from the Golan Heights.

By forcible removing thousands of his own citizens, Sharon has established an important precedent and one wonders how he or future Israeli leaders can defy demands for "disengagement," perhaps under U.S. or international pressure. (August 18, 2005)

Aug. 21, 2005 update: At least one Israeli official, Health Minister Danny Naveh of the Likud party, has said he wants the Sharon government to demand this statement by Condoleezza Rice.

Aug. 27, 2005 update: For the correction to the above quotation, see "1.378 Words Later – Or, How to Mangle an Interview with the Secretary of State."

Aug. 28, 2005 update: Condoleezza Rice did not portray the Gaza withdrawal as a model for future Israeli retreats, but the European Union envoy to the Middle East, Mark Otte, did. He told Al-Quds "Our position regarding the West Bank and east Jerusalem is identical - they are occupied territories."

TrackBack URL for this post: http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/trackback.php/497/627cb/882

Comment on this weblog entry

Name	Email Address (optional) Email me if someone replies to my comment
Title of Comments
Comments:
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. Top 25 recent comments Daniel Pipes Blog Homepage

Daniel Pipes Blog Homepage

ADVERTISEMENTS